Tongan vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Tongan
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Tongans
Chinese
7,132
SOCIAL INDEX
68.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
130th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Tongan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,272,399 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Tongan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.346. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tongans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.028% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tongans corresponds to a decrease of 28.3 Chinese.
Tongan vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Tongan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($68,235 compared to $77,465, a difference of 13.5%), per capita income ($41,693 compared to $46,098, a difference of 10.6%), and median family income ($105,967 compared to $116,188, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,972 compared to $58,162, a difference of 2.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,604 compared to $104,264, a difference of 4.7%), and median household income ($93,076 compared to $98,496, a difference of 5.8%).
Income Metric | Tongan | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $41,693 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $105,967 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $93,076 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Fair $45,665 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Fair $53,218 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,288 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $56,972 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $99,604 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $108,643 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $68,235 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.5% | Average 25.9% |
Tongan vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tongan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 30.0%), single father poverty (12.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 26.1%), and family poverty (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.86%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and single male poverty (10.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.1%).
Poverty Metric | Tongan | Chinese |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Exceptional 9.7% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 17.1% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.5% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.8% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 12.2% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.5% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.3% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.7% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Tongan vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tongan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 75.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 38.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 0.87%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Tongan | Chinese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.9% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.9% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 5.5% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.4% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.9% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 6.7% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Tongan vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tongan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.9% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.84%).
Labor Participation Metric | Tongan | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.5% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.3% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.2% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.9% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.7% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.5% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.6% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Excellent 83.1% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Tongan vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tongan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 27.7%), family households with children (31.2% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 20.1%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.0%), family households (69.6% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and currently married (48.3% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 2.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Tongan | Chinese |
Family Households | Exceptional 69.6% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 31.2% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 51.6% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.49 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.3% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.4% | Excellent 30.2% |
Tongan vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tongan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 14.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 13.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.9% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (63.5% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 11.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Tongan | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.9% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 63.5% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 26.5% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Tongan vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tongan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 54.5%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 20.1%), and master's degree (12.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.83%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.84%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.84%).
Education Level Metric | Tongan | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.4% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.3% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Poor 92.2% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Poor 90.7% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 88.4% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Fair 64.5% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Poor 57.8% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.0% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 34.3% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.5% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Poor 1.7% | Fair 1.8% |
Tongan vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tongan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 26.7%), ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.80%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.1%).
Disability Metric | Tongan | Chinese |
Disability | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Excellent 6.4% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.8% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.3% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Good 2.9% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |