Guyanese vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Guyanese
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Guyanese
Chinese
2,059
SOCIAL INDEX
18.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
273rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Guyanese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,104,891 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Guyanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.311. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guyanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.052% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guyanese corresponds to a decrease of 52.2 Chinese.
Guyanese vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.3% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 41.5%), householder income over 65 years ($56,351 compared to $77,465, a difference of 37.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,966 compared to $116,156, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,973 compared to $41,461, a difference of 1.2%), householder income under 25 years ($55,210 compared to $58,162, a difference of 5.3%), and median earnings ($45,470 compared to $48,836, a difference of 7.4%).
Income Metric | Guyanese | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $40,949 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $93,373 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $80,734 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Fair $45,470 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,613 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,973 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $55,210 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $89,940 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $90,966 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,351 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 18.3% | Average 25.9% |
Guyanese vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 77.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 77.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 73.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 5.6%), single male poverty (12.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 16.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 19.8%).
Poverty Metric | Guyanese | Chinese |
Poverty | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.4% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.7% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.3% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.4% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Average 12.8% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Average 21.0% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Average 16.3% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Poor 29.8% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Guyanese vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (24.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 54.7%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (14.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 49.3%), and female unemployment (6.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 48.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 21.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 27.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Guyanese | Chinese |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 24.8% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.5% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.1% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Guyanese vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (27.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 40.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.2% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 11.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.1% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.87%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Guyanese | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.1% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.1% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 27.4% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.2% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.0% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.8% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.5% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Guyanese vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 47.3%), married-couple households (41.4% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 21.7%), and currently married (41.6% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.3% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.40 compared to 3.34, a difference of 1.7%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Guyanese | Chinese |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.3% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.4% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.40 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.6% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 41.6% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 35.2% | Excellent 30.2% |
Guyanese vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 256.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 153.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 108.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.8% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 29.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.4% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 69.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 108.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Guyanese | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 29.3% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 70.8% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 35.4% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.5% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Guyanese vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 106.2%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 27.9%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.7%).
Education Level Metric | Guyanese | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.1% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.6% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.7% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.4% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.9% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.3% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.5% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.3% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.0% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.1% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.3% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 34.5% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 13.7% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.8% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Fair 1.8% |
Guyanese vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 61.0%), male disability (10.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 15.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.8%), ambulatory disability (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 3.9%).
Disability Metric | Guyanese | Chinese |
Disability | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.0% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.5% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Good 11.0% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 23.4% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Excellent 46.9% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Fair 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Poor 17.5% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.6% |