Potawatomi vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Potawatomi
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Potawatomi
Chinese
3,223
SOCIAL INDEX
29.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
227th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Potawatomi Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,996,280 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Potawatomi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.903. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Potawatomi within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.670% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Potawatomi corresponds to an increase of 670.1 Chinese.
Potawatomi vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,212 compared to $77,465, a difference of 42.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($84,613 compared to $116,156, a difference of 37.3%), and median household income ($72,576 compared to $98,496, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 7.0%), median male earnings ($48,768 compared to $56,872, a difference of 16.6%), and median earnings ($41,288 compared to $48,836, a difference of 18.3%).
Income Metric | Potawatomi | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,046 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,265 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $72,576 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,288 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,768 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,739 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $46,462 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $81,774 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $84,613 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,212 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.7% | Average 25.9% |
Potawatomi vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (19.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 63.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 60.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 59.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 22.7%), receiving food stamps (12.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 27.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 29.7%).
Poverty Metric | Potawatomi | Chinese |
Poverty | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Tragic 10.2% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.3% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 23.7% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.5% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.0% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.4% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.2% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 15.8% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.4% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.9% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.1% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.8% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Average 12.1% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Poor 12.5% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Potawatomi vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 40.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 32.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 7.4%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 8.0%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Potawatomi | Chinese |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Average 10.3% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 5.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.6% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.5% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Potawatomi vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.2% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.2% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Potawatomi | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.8% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.2% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.0% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.2% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.8% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.7% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.0% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Potawatomi vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 27.9%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 27.8%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 3.3%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.34, a difference of 5.6%), and currently married (46.5% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 6.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Potawatomi | Chinese |
Family Households | Tragic 63.3% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.9% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Poor 45.7% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.16 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Poor 6.6% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Average 46.5% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.2% | Excellent 30.2% |
Potawatomi vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 21.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 9.2%), and no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.61%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 7.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Potawatomi | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.3% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.0% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.9% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Potawatomi vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 25.3%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 20.8%), and bachelor's degree (31.9% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.23%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.23%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.23%).
Education Level Metric | Potawatomi | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.3% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 91.0% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.0% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.7% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.8% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.6% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.4% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.9% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.1% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.6% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Fair 1.8% |
Potawatomi vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 43.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 39.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.64%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and hearing disability (4.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 11.9%).
Disability Metric | Potawatomi | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 14.1% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.0% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.0% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.1% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.3% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |