Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,220,296 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.186. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.039% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to a decrease of 39.1 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $53,680, a difference of 4.7%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $106,453, a difference of 3.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $103,705, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $97,623, a difference of 0.99%), median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $55,712, a difference of 1.1%), and median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $40,297, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.1%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 20.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.92%), single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.1%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 12.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.68%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.2%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 6.6%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.71%), married-couple households (47.4% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.95%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 18.4%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 0.54%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.72%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 29.8%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 20.8%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.50%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 16.0%), ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.8%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.080%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.14%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.3%).