Pakistani vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pakistani
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pakistanis
Chinese
8,084
SOCIAL INDEX
78.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
88th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Pakistani Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,487,544 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Pakistani communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.189. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pakistanis within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.089% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pakistanis corresponds to an increase of 89.4 Chinese.
Pakistani vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($63,844 compared to $77,465, a difference of 21.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,317 compared to $116,156, a difference of 10.3%), and median household income ($89,638 compared to $98,496, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,719 compared to $56,872, a difference of 0.27%), wage/income gap (26.1% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 0.57%), and per capita income ($45,587 compared to $46,098, a difference of 1.1%).
Income Metric | Pakistani | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Excellent $45,587 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $107,390 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,638 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,254 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,719 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Excellent $40,596 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,325 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $98,401 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $105,317 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $63,844 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.1% | Average 25.9% |
Pakistani vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 29.9%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 29.7%), and family poverty (8.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 2.2%), receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 6.9%), and single male poverty (12.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 12.7%).
Poverty Metric | Pakistani | Chinese |
Poverty | Excellent 11.9% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Exceptional 8.3% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Excellent 10.8% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Excellent 12.9% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 19.8% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Excellent 13.0% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.1% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.4% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.2% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.7% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.0% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.8% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Pakistani vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 50.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 21.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 4.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 5.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Pakistani | Chinese |
Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Good 4.6% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Excellent 4.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.9% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.4% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Pakistani vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.85%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pakistani | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.8% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.8% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.6% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.8% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.8% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Good 84.7% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Average 84.4% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Average 82.8% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Pakistani vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.8%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 16.6%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 0.80%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.8%), and currently married (47.2% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 5.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Pakistani | Chinese |
Family Households | Excellent 64.7% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.3% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.22 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Good 2.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.1% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Good 47.2% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.5% | Excellent 30.2% |
Pakistani vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 26.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 13.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.62%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 9.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pakistani | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.0% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.3% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.9% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.0% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Pakistani vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 43.0%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 16.1%), and master's degree (15.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.64%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.65%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.65%).
Education Level Metric | Pakistani | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Fair 97.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Fair 97.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Fair 97.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Average 97.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Average 96.0% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Average 95.7% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Good 95.0% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Good 93.9% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.6% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.4% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.5% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 61.5% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Excellent 48.1% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Excellent 39.7% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Excellent 15.8% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 4.8% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.0% | Fair 1.8% |
Pakistani vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 17.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 16.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.2%), female disability (12.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 4.4%).
Disability Metric | Pakistani | Chinese |
Disability | Average 11.7% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Fair 11.3% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Excellent 12.0% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Poor 1.3% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Excellent 5.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Good 11.1% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 23.2% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Fair 47.7% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Good 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Poor 3.1% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Good 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |