Zimbabwean vs Subsaharan African Community Comparison

COMPARE

Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Subsaharan African
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Zimbabweans

Sub-Saharan Africans

Exceptional
Tragic
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
977
SOCIAL INDEX
7.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
330th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Subsaharan African Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,193,619 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.503. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.791% in Sub-Saharan Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 791.4 Sub-Saharan Africans.
Zimbabwean Integration in Subsaharan African Communities

Zimbabwean vs Subsaharan African Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $90,691, a difference of 17.8%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $93,748, a difference of 17.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $84,235, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $48,691, a difference of 5.3%), median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $38,391, a difference of 6.3%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $44,118, a difference of 9.3%).
Zimbabwean vs Subsaharan African Income
Income MetricZimbabweanSubsaharan African
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,804
Tragic
$40,152
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$110,011
Tragic
$93,748
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,618
Tragic
$77,631
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,229
Tragic
$44,118
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,302
Tragic
$50,408
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,798
Tragic
$38,391
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,259
Tragic
$48,691
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$98,586
Tragic
$84,235
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,849
Tragic
$90,691
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,854
Tragic
$56,615
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Exceptional
22.8%

Zimbabwean vs Subsaharan African Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 48.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.2% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 40.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 4.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 7.8%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 8.6%).
Zimbabwean vs Subsaharan African Poverty
Poverty MetricZimbabweanSubsaharan African
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
14.5%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
10.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
13.3%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
15.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Tragic
22.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
15.6%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
20.8%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
20.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
20.1%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Tragic
13.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.5%
Tragic
23.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
16.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
31.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
12.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
13.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
14.1%

Zimbabwean vs Subsaharan African Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 24.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 24.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 5.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.0%).
Zimbabwean vs Subsaharan African Unemployment
Unemployment MetricZimbabweanSubsaharan African
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.0%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
18.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
11.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Poor
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
8.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.2%

Zimbabwean vs Subsaharan African Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.7%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 0.72%).
Zimbabwean vs Subsaharan African Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricZimbabweanSubsaharan African
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.3%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.0%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Exceptional
38.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Exceptional
75.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Poor
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Poor
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.1%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Tragic
82.0%

Zimbabwean vs Subsaharan African Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 28.7%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 27.8%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.6%), and family households (64.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.2%).
Zimbabwean vs Subsaharan African Family Structure
Family Structure MetricZimbabweanSubsaharan African
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Tragic
62.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.4%
Tragic
41.6%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Excellent
3.25
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.1%
Tragic
7.8%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Tragic
42.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
12.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Tragic
36.7%

Zimbabwean vs Subsaharan African Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 35.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 13.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 10.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.8%).
Zimbabwean vs Subsaharan African Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricZimbabweanSubsaharan African
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Tragic
12.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Tragic
87.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Tragic
51.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.3%
Tragic
17.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Tragic
5.7%

Zimbabwean vs Subsaharan African Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 33.2%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 28.7%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.59%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.59%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.60%).
Zimbabwean vs Subsaharan African Education Level
Education Level MetricZimbabweanSubsaharan African
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Tragic
94.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Tragic
91.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Tragic
90.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Tragic
87.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Tragic
84.2%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.9%
Tragic
63.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.2%
Tragic
57.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.3%
Tragic
43.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Tragic
35.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Poor
14.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Poor
4.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Fair
1.8%

Zimbabwean vs Subsaharan African Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 21.0%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.6%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.31%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 5.2%).
Zimbabwean vs Subsaharan African Disability
Disability MetricZimbabweanSubsaharan African
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
12.3%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
11.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
25.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.1%
Tragic
48.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
18.5%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.4%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%