Immigrants from Ecuador vs Chinese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Ecuador
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chinese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Ecuador

Chinese

Poor
Exceptional
2,063
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
272nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chinese Integration in Immigrants from Ecuador Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,056,290 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.724. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.174% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to an increase of 173.7 Chinese.
Immigrants from Ecuador Integration in Chinese Communities

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Chinese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,030 compared to $77,465, a difference of 43.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,462 compared to $116,156, a difference of 27.0%), and median family income ($92,837 compared to $116,188, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,644 compared to $41,461, a difference of 7.3%), householder income under 25 years ($53,722 compared to $58,162, a difference of 8.3%), and median earnings ($44,462 compared to $48,836, a difference of 9.8%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Chinese Income
Income MetricImmigrants from EcuadorChinese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,195
Exceptional
$46,098
Median Family Income
Tragic
$92,837
Exceptional
$116,188
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,341
Exceptional
$98,496
Median Earnings
Tragic
$44,462
Exceptional
$48,836
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,474
Exceptional
$56,872
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,644
Exceptional
$41,461
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,722
Exceptional
$58,162
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$89,673
Exceptional
$104,264
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,462
Exceptional
$116,156
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,030
Exceptional
$77,465
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.5%
Average
25.9%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Chinese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 85.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 77.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 73.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 5.8%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 14.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 18.6%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Chinese Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from EcuadorChinese
Poverty
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
9.5%
Families
Tragic
11.1%
Exceptional
6.5%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
8.7%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.2%
Exceptional
16.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
11.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
13.1%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
11.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
11.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Exceptional
11.0%
Single Females
Tragic
22.0%
Exceptional
16.1%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
24.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
3.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
8.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
9.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
9.8%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Chinese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 45.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 44.6%), and female unemployment (6.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 10.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 15.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 21.8%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Chinese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from EcuadorChinese
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.5%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.9%
Exceptional
16.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.5%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.9%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Chinese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 24.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.83%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Chinese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from EcuadorChinese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
38.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.3%
Exceptional
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.3%
Poor
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.3%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.1%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.2%
Exceptional
84.1%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Chinese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 42.2%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 22.3%), and married-couple households (42.9% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.34, a difference of 0.56%), family households (64.8% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 5.9%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Chinese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from EcuadorChinese
Family Households
Exceptional
64.8%
Exceptional
68.1%
Family Households with Children
Excellent
27.7%
Tragic
26.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.9%
Exceptional
50.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Exceptional
49.5%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
33.7%
Excellent
30.2%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Chinese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 189.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 109.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 78.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 20.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 48.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 78.1%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from EcuadorChinese
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
23.8%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
91.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
40.5%
Exceptional
60.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
23.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
8.8%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Chinese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 109.4%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 25.3%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.7%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Chinese Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from EcuadorChinese
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.7%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.3%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.4%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.1%
Exceptional
94.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.5%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
84.8%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.0%
Exceptional
89.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
58.7%
Exceptional
68.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.4%
Exceptional
62.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.2%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.7%
Good
38.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.6%
Fair
14.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Average
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Fair
1.8%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Chinese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 48.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.4%), and male disability (10.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.16%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.7%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Chinese Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from EcuadorChinese
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.7%
Exceptional
21.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Good
17.2%
Exceptional
15.9%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%