Native Hawaiian vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,048,343 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.097. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 2.6 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,017 compared to $46,098, a difference of 12.4%), median family income ($104,910 compared to $116,188, a difference of 10.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,149 compared to $116,156, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 1.8%), householder income under 25 years ($55,158 compared to $58,162, a difference of 5.4%), and median female earnings ($38,461 compared to $41,461, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 31.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 28.3%), and family poverty (8.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 2.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 10.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 41.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 28.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.3%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 11.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.90%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 26.5%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.6%), and births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.4% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 0.36%), married-couple households (49.1% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and average family size (3.43 compared to 3.34, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 6.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 6.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.64%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 18.7%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 17.3%), and bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.060%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 18.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 13.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.080%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.21%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.69%).