Hawaiian vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Hawaiian
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Hawaiians
Chinese
3,537
SOCIAL INDEX
32.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
218th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Hawaiian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,800,639 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.002. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 0.0 Chinese.
Hawaiian vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,920 compared to $77,465, a difference of 19.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,778 compared to $116,156, a difference of 17.6%), and median family income ($98,869 compared to $116,188, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 4.1%), householder income under 25 years ($53,078 compared to $58,162, a difference of 9.6%), and median female earnings ($37,497 compared to $41,461, a difference of 10.6%).
Income Metric | Hawaiian | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,403 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Poor $98,869 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Average $84,729 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,673 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,488 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,497 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Excellent $53,078 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Poor $90,722 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Fair $98,778 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,920 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 24.9% | Average 25.9% |
Hawaiian vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 41.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (16.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 39.2%), and family poverty (9.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 2.1%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 14.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 15.9%).
Poverty Metric | Hawaiian | Chinese |
Poverty | Fair 12.5% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Average 9.0% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Fair 11.4% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Fair 13.6% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.7% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Poor 14.1% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Average 17.4% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Fair 16.4% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.5% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Average 16.6% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Good 12.6% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Fair 21.2% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.1% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Average 29.2% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Good 5.1% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.1% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Hawaiian vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 56.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 29.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 10.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 11.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Hawaiian | Chinese |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.0% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 17.9% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Poor 6.8% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Fair 4.5% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Average 5.5% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Hawaiian vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 0.52%).
Labor Participation Metric | Hawaiian | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.4% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.0% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.0% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.0% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.2% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.5% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Hawaiian vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 34.8%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 27.8%), and family households with children (28.7% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.4% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.41 compared to 3.34, a difference of 2.0%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 5.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Hawaiian | Chinese |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.4% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.7% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.8% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.41 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Poor 6.6% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Average 12.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.2% | Excellent 30.2% |
Hawaiian vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 2.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.20%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 0.52%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 1.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Hawaiian | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.0% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.0% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.4% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 24.3% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.9% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Hawaiian vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 46.7%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 29.6%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.67%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.67%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.68%).
Education Level Metric | Hawaiian | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Fair 2.2% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Fair 97.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Fair 97.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Fair 97.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Fair 97.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Fair 96.9% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Poor 95.8% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Poor 95.5% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Fair 94.7% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.5% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Poor 90.8% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.6% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Poor 85.0% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.1% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.6% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.9% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.6% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.6% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Fair 1.8% |
Hawaiian vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 19.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 17.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.18%), disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.95%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.5%).
Disability Metric | Hawaiian | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.5% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.2% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |