Hispanic or Latino vs Chinese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Hispanic or Latino
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chinese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Hispanics or Latinos

Chinese

Tragic
Exceptional
991
SOCIAL INDEX
7.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
328th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chinese Integration in Hispanic or Latino Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,805,169 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.424. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hispanics or Latinos within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hispanics or Latinos corresponds to a decrease of 1.4 Chinese.
Hispanic or Latino Integration in Chinese Communities

Hispanic or Latino vs Chinese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($52,832 compared to $77,465, a difference of 46.6%), median family income ($85,647 compared to $116,188, a difference of 35.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,006 compared to $116,156, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 4.2%), householder income under 25 years ($50,279 compared to $58,162, a difference of 15.7%), and median female earnings ($34,421 compared to $41,461, a difference of 20.4%).
Hispanic or Latino vs Chinese Income
Income MetricHispanic or LatinoChinese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,688
Exceptional
$46,098
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,647
Exceptional
$116,188
Median Household Income
Tragic
$73,823
Exceptional
$98,496
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,288
Exceptional
$48,836
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,419
Exceptional
$56,872
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,421
Exceptional
$41,461
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,279
Exceptional
$58,162
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,515
Exceptional
$104,264
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,006
Exceptional
$116,156
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,832
Exceptional
$77,465
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
24.9%
Average
25.9%

Hispanic or Latino vs Chinese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 105.3%), family poverty (12.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 83.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (20.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 76.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 9.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 26.9%), and single male poverty (14.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 29.3%).
Hispanic or Latino vs Chinese Poverty
Poverty MetricHispanic or LatinoChinese
Poverty
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
9.5%
Families
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
6.5%
Males
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
8.7%
Females
Tragic
16.6%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Poor
20.5%
Exceptional
16.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.6%
Exceptional
11.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
13.1%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
11.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
20.9%
Exceptional
11.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Males
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.0%
Single Females
Tragic
24.6%
Exceptional
16.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.8%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
33.3%
Exceptional
24.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
3.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
8.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
9.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
9.8%

Hispanic or Latino vs Chinese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 53.8%), female unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 39.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 7.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 14.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 15.5%).
Hispanic or Latino vs Chinese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricHispanic or LatinoChinese
Unemployment
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
16.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.9%

Hispanic or Latino vs Chinese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 11.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.6% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.1%).
Hispanic or Latino vs Chinese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricHispanic or LatinoChinese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.3%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.6%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
38.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.4%
Exceptional
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.2%
Poor
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.4%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.1%
Exceptional
84.1%

Hispanic or Latino vs Chinese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 53.3%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 43.0%), and births to unmarried women (37.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.4% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.41 compared to 3.34, a difference of 2.0%), and married-couple households (45.4% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 10.9%).
Hispanic or Latino vs Chinese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricHispanic or LatinoChinese
Family Households
Exceptional
67.4%
Exceptional
68.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.9%
Tragic
26.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.4%
Exceptional
50.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.41
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
5.2%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.1%
Exceptional
49.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.8%
Excellent
30.2%

Hispanic or Latino vs Chinese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 16.2%), no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 10.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.95%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 6.7%).
Hispanic or Latino vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricHispanic or LatinoChinese
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Exceptional
91.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.9%
Exceptional
60.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.4%
Exceptional
23.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
8.8%

Hispanic or Latino vs Chinese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 106.1%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 40.8%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%).
Hispanic or Latino vs Chinese Education Level
Education Level MetricHispanic or LatinoChinese
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
92.7%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
92.2%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
90.9%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
88.9%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.3%
Exceptional
94.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
85.4%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
79.1%
Exceptional
89.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
57.0%
Exceptional
68.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
51.1%
Exceptional
62.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.7%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.6%
Good
38.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.9%
Fair
14.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Average
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Fair
1.8%

Hispanic or Latino vs Chinese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 26.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 26.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.74%), ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.96%), and female disability (12.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.1%).
Hispanic or Latino vs Chinese Disability
Disability MetricHispanic or LatinoChinese
Disability
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.7%
Exceptional
21.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.6%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
15.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.6%