Menominee vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Menominee
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Menominee
Chinese
3,175
SOCIAL INDEX
29.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
229th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Menominee Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,455,983 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Menominee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Menominee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.666% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Menominee corresponds to an increase of 666.0 Chinese.
Menominee vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Menominee and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($76,903 compared to $116,156, a difference of 51.0%), householder income over 65 years ($51,719 compared to $77,465, a difference of 49.8%), and median family income ($79,563 compared to $116,188, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 14.1%), householder income under 25 years ($47,907 compared to $58,162, a difference of 21.4%), and median female earnings ($33,894 compared to $41,461, a difference of 22.3%).
Income Metric | Menominee | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $34,578 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $79,563 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $68,423 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $37,884 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,581 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,894 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,907 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $79,358 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $76,903 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $51,719 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.7% | Average 25.9% |
Menominee vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Menominee and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (25.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 102.7%), family poverty (12.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 95.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (23.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 92.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 8.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 12.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 16.8%).
Poverty Metric | Menominee | Chinese |
Poverty | Tragic 16.4% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Tragic 15.3% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Tragic 17.6% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.5% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.3% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 23.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.7% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 25.0% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 27.8% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 16.8% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 37.1% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Average 5.2% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 17.2% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Menominee vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Menominee and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (10.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 139.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 85.2%), and female unemployment (7.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 57.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.6% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 3.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Menominee | Chinese |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.6% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.3% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 10.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Menominee vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Menominee and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 14.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (68.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 12.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 6.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Menominee | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 60.6% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.3% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 33.9% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 68.7% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.4% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.2% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 79.7% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.4% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Menominee vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Menominee and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 113.7%), single mother households (9.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 77.5%), and births to unmarried women (51.1% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 69.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.30 compared to 3.34, a difference of 1.1%), family households (66.5% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 5.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Menominee | Chinese |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.5% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.0% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.30 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 42.3% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.1% | Excellent 30.2% |
Menominee vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Menominee and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 77.9%), no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 43.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 39.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Menominee | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.3% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Average 55.3% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.2% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Menominee vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Menominee and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 43.9%), master's degree (10.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 43.0%), and bachelor's degree (27.3% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.39%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.39%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.39%).
Education Level Metric | Menominee | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Excellent 1.9% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 91.9% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.3% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Good 86.3% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 57.0% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 50.6% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 36.7% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 27.3% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.2% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.1% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Fair 1.8% |
Menominee vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Menominee and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 101.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 54.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 1.7%), female disability (12.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age over 75 (52.3% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 7.3%).
Disability Metric | Menominee | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 12.6% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.4% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 52.3% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.6% |