Zimbabwean vs Jordanian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,891,913 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Jordanians within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.044. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Jordanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to a decrease of 6.6 Jordanians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $58,500, a difference of 3.9%), median earnings ($48,229 compared to $49,632, a difference of 2.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $64,313, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($110,011 compared to $109,865, a difference of 0.13%), per capita income ($45,804 compared to $45,605, a difference of 0.44%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $99,186, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 18.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 9.9%), and receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.47%), poverty (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and male poverty (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 14.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.0%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.27%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (27.9% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 3.8%), family households (64.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.59%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 6.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 0.68%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.46%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 0.56%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 14.1%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.4%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.26%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.26%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.8%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.6%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.0%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.11%), and disability (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.65%).