Nepalese vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 12,636,804 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Nepalese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.565. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Nepalese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.059% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Nepalese corresponds to an increase of 58.5 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($58,761 compared to $77,465, a difference of 31.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,355 compared to $116,156, a difference of 24.4%), and median family income ($94,153 compared to $116,188, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,472 compared to $58,162, a difference of 6.8%), median female earnings ($38,603 compared to $41,461, a difference of 7.4%), and median earnings ($43,860 compared to $48,836, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 79.1%), family poverty (10.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 60.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.5%), single father poverty (14.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 19.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 71.1%), unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 32.7%), and female unemployment (5.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 12.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 12.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 15.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 58.1%), single mother households (7.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 44.4%), and family households with children (30.5% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.2% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 1.4%), average family size (3.42 compared to 3.34, a difference of 2.4%), and married-couple households (45.6% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 11.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.6% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.84%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 158.5%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 40.8%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 2.5%), kindergarten (96.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and 1st grade (96.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (28.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 29.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 24.5%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.2%), ambulatory disability (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability (12.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.6%).