Immigrants from Asia vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,658,067 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to an increase of 1.7 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($67,594 compared to $77,465, a difference of 14.6%), median male earnings ($63,240 compared to $56,872, a difference of 11.2%), and median earnings ($53,310 compared to $48,836, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,566 compared to $116,156, a difference of 0.35%), median household income ($99,933 compared to $98,496, a difference of 1.5%), and median family income ($118,291 compared to $116,188, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 34.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 32.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.3%), single male poverty (11.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and single father poverty (14.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 40.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 22.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.30%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.94%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 13.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 12.9%), family households with children (28.8% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 10.9%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.34, a difference of 2.2%), currently married (48.3% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and married-couple households (49.1% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 32.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 30.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 17.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 64.2%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 37.5%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.97%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.98%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 34.1%), male disability (10.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 20.3%), and ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.78%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 3.6%).