Panamanian vs Chinese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Panamanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chinese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Panamanians

Chinese

Poor
Exceptional
2,119
SOCIAL INDEX
18.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
268th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chinese Integration in Panamanian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,496,716 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Panamanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.190. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Panamanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.025% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Panamanians corresponds to an increase of 24.7 Chinese.
Panamanian Integration in Chinese Communities

Panamanian vs Chinese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($58,266 compared to $77,465, a difference of 33.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,066 compared to $116,156, a difference of 20.9%), and median household income ($82,272 compared to $98,496, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,049 compared to $41,461, a difference of 6.2%), wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 6.3%), and median earnings ($45,593 compared to $48,836, a difference of 7.1%).
Panamanian vs Chinese Income
Income MetricPanamanianChinese
Per Capita Income
Poor
$42,035
Exceptional
$46,098
Median Family Income
Tragic
$97,683
Exceptional
$116,188
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,272
Exceptional
$98,496
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,593
Exceptional
$48,836
Median Male Earnings
Poor
$52,835
Exceptional
$56,872
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,049
Exceptional
$41,461
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,611
Exceptional
$58,162
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$90,193
Exceptional
$104,264
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$96,066
Exceptional
$116,156
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,266
Exceptional
$77,465
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.4%
Average
25.9%

Panamanian vs Chinese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 52.6%), family poverty (9.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 51.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (17.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 49.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 6.6%), single male poverty (12.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 17.3%), and single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 20.4%).
Panamanian vs Chinese Poverty
Poverty MetricPanamanianChinese
Poverty
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
9.5%
Families
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
6.5%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
8.7%
Females
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Excellent
19.7%
Exceptional
16.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
13.1%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
11.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
11.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Males
Fair
12.9%
Exceptional
11.0%
Single Females
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
16.1%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.4%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.6%
Exceptional
24.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
3.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
8.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
9.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
9.8%

Panamanian vs Chinese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 54.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 23.0%), and female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 7.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 12.5%).
Panamanian vs Chinese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPanamanianChinese
Unemployment
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.5%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
16.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.9%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 65
Average
5.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.6%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Poor
5.7%
Exceptional
4.9%

Panamanian vs Chinese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.95%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.0%).
Panamanian vs Chinese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPanamanianChinese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Good
65.3%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.1%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.1%
Exceptional
38.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Exceptional
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Poor
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.2%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.2%
Exceptional
84.1%

Panamanian vs Chinese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 37.9%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.4%), and births to unmarried women (34.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.34, a difference of 2.7%), family households (64.8% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 8.4%).
Panamanian vs Chinese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPanamanianChinese
Family Households
Exceptional
64.8%
Exceptional
68.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Tragic
26.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.2%
Exceptional
50.4%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.3%
Exceptional
49.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.2%
Excellent
30.2%

Panamanian vs Chinese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 52.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 46.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 12.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 27.3%).
Panamanian vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPanamanianChinese
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
87.5%
Exceptional
91.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.5%
Exceptional
60.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Exceptional
23.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.0%
Exceptional
8.8%

Panamanian vs Chinese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 42.9%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 7.8%), and associate's degree (45.1% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.64%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.66%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.66%).
Panamanian vs Chinese Education Level
Education Level MetricPanamanianChinese
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Fair
97.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Fair
97.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Fair
96.9%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Fair
95.9%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Fair
94.7%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Fair
93.5%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Exceptional
94.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
90.8%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.6%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
85.0%
Exceptional
89.0%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
64.3%
Exceptional
68.3%
College, 1 year or more
Poor
58.3%
Exceptional
62.2%
Associate's Degree
Poor
45.1%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Poor
36.5%
Good
38.5%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.4%
Fair
14.6%
Professional Degree
Poor
4.1%
Average
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.7%
Fair
1.8%

Panamanian vs Chinese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 26.9%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 22.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.56%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.96%), and disability (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.1%).
Panamanian vs Chinese Disability
Disability MetricPanamanianChinese
Disability
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
21.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Average
3.0%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.8%
Exceptional
15.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%