Creek vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Creek
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Creek
Chinese
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Creek Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,417,601 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.145. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.027% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 26.7 Chinese.
Creek vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $77,465, a difference of 49.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $116,156, a difference of 47.1%), and median household income ($67,715 compared to $98,496, a difference of 45.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 4.7%), median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $56,872, a difference of 22.1%), and median earnings ($39,648 compared to $48,836, a difference of 23.2%).
Income Metric | Creek | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $35,546 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $82,560 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $67,715 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $39,648 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,594 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,437 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,371 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $74,847 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $78,960 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $51,949 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.1% | Average 25.9% |
Creek vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 85.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (21.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 81.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 80.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 27.5%), single father poverty (19.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 28.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 31.2%).
Poverty Metric | Creek | Chinese |
Poverty | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.2% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 19.2% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 24.2% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.7% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.8% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 27.4% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 36.7% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Average 10.9% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Creek vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 32.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 31.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Creek | Chinese |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.6% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Poor 4.6% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.9% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.4% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Creek vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 4.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Creek | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.3% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.1% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.1% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 80.7% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 80.4% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.0% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.7% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Creek vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 36.1%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 32.0%), and divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.34, a difference of 4.4%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and family households (64.2% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 6.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Creek | Chinese |
Family Households | Fair 64.2% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.4% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 45.3% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Poor 46.0% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 37.6% | Excellent 30.2% |
Creek vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 23.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 8.9%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.48%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Creek | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.3% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.9% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Creek vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 44.1%), master's degree (10.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 38.6%), and bachelor's degree (28.9% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.14%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.15%).
Education Level Metric | Creek | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.2% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Average 92.4% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 88.3% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.6% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.3% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 52.2% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 37.6% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.9% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.5% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.1% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Fair 1.8% |
Creek vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 64.0%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 56.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 5.6%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.3%), and cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 14.7%).
Disability Metric | Creek | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.5% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.7% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.9% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.5% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.4% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.3% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.5% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.6% |