Immigrants from Chile vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,417,396 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.436. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.616% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 615.7 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,354 compared to $77,465, a difference of 24.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,412 compared to $116,156, a difference of 12.3%), and median household income ($88,388 compared to $98,496, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($46,213 compared to $46,098, a difference of 0.25%), wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 0.74%), and median male earnings ($55,954 compared to $56,872, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 46.1%), married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 45.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 1.8%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 10.0%), and single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 32.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 24.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.1%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.2%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 3.1%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.2%), and family households (64.6% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 45.8%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 33.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 10.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 26.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 47.8%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 19.3%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.71%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.72%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 31.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 14.9%), and male disability (10.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.4%).