Immigrants from Uganda vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uganda
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Uganda
Chinese
6,298
SOCIAL INDEX
60.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
157th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Immigrants from Uganda Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,181,595 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Uganda communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.442. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uganda within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.319% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uganda corresponds to an increase of 1,318.8 Chinese.
Immigrants from Uganda vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,976 compared to $77,465, a difference of 25.0%), median household income ($87,553 compared to $98,496, a difference of 12.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,584 compared to $116,156, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,064 compared to $56,872, a difference of 1.4%), median earnings ($48,041 compared to $48,836, a difference of 1.7%), and median female earnings ($40,739 compared to $41,461, a difference of 1.8%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Excellent $45,043 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,188 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Excellent $87,553 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,041 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,064 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Excellent $40,739 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,374 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $95,698 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,584 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $61,976 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 24.9% | Average 25.9% |
Immigrants from Uganda vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (17.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 43.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 42.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 8.6%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 14.8%), and single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 14.9%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Chinese |
Poverty | Poor 12.8% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Average 9.1% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Fair 13.7% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.8% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.5% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Fair 17.7% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Fair 16.8% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Fair 17.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Fair 16.8% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Good 12.6% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Excellent 20.3% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.3% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Average 5.2% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.1% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.8% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Average 11.9% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Immigrants from Uganda vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 35.6%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 17.5%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 3.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Chinese |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.5% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.2% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Average 4.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.0% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Excellent 7.4% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.7% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants from Uganda vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.080%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.24%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.5% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.2% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.0% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.0% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.2% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.0% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.7% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Immigrants from Uganda vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 27.3%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.8%), and married-couple households (44.6% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 0.88%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.3%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 5.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Chinese |
Family Households | Tragic 62.7% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.0% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.6% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Good 3.23 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Poor 6.6% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.0% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.5% | Excellent 30.2% |
Immigrants from Uganda vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 49.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 29.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 9.3%), and no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 21.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.0% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.1% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 55.0% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Immigrants from Uganda vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 57.1%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 25.4%), and master's degree (16.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (48.5% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.10%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.71%), and 2nd grade (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.71%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Poor 97.9% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Fair 97.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Fair 97.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Poor 97.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Fair 97.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Fair 96.9% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Fair 96.0% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Average 94.8% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.5% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 90.9% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Fair 88.9% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Average 85.7% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Excellent 66.5% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Excellent 60.9% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.7% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.6% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.0% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Fair 1.8% |
Immigrants from Uganda vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 28.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 22.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.84%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 4.1%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Chinese |
Disability | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.8% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Average 11.2% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 22.8% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Excellent 46.8% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |