Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Portugal Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,641,364 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Portugal within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.259. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.042% in Immigrants from Portugal. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to a decrease of 42.5 Immigrants from Portugal.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $55,924, a difference of 17.8%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $100,984, a difference of 8.9%), and per capita income ($45,804 compared to $42,412, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.5%), median earnings ($48,229 compared to $47,304, a difference of 1.9%), and median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $55,182, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 50.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 26.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 2.1%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 6.0%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 30.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 26.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.37%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 26.1%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 19.3%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.56%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.77%), and family households (64.1% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 29.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 8.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 3.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 54.4%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 50.3%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 46.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.97%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.98%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 52.5%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 28.3%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 0.84%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 11.5%).