Zimbabwean vs Cherokee Community Comparison
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Cherokee
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Zimbabweans
Cherokee
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Cherokee Integration in Zimbabwean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,587,058 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.041. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.025% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 25.1 Cherokee.
Zimbabwean vs Cherokee Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($110,011 compared to $88,209, a difference of 24.7%), median household income ($90,618 compared to $72,682, a difference of 24.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $86,125, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.2%), householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $47,848, a difference of 7.1%), and median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $48,669, a difference of 15.7%).
Income Metric | Zimbabwean | Cherokee |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $45,804 | Tragic $37,203 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $110,011 | Tragic $88,209 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,618 | Tragic $72,682 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,229 | Tragic $41,252 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,302 | Tragic $48,669 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,798 | Tragic $34,742 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,259 | Tragic $47,848 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $98,586 | Tragic $80,843 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,849 | Tragic $86,125 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,854 | Tragic $54,133 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Tragic 27.4% |
Zimbabwean vs Cherokee Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 47.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 42.9%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 11.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 14.1%).
Poverty Metric | Zimbabwean | Cherokee |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 14.4% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 10.6% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 13.1% |
Females | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Tragic 22.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 17.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Tragic 21.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 19.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Tragic 19.9% |
Single Males | Poor 13.1% | Tragic 16.1% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.5% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.6% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 34.5% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.6% | Average 11.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 13.2% |
Zimbabwean vs Cherokee Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 31.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 27.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Zimbabwean | Cherokee |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Fair 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.2% | Fair 11.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Poor 17.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Tragic 10.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Poor 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.9% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Average 8.7% | Tragic 9.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.7% |
Zimbabwean vs Cherokee Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 3.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Zimbabwean | Cherokee |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.3% | Tragic 61.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.0% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.7% | Exceptional 40.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Exceptional 75.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Fair 84.5% | Tragic 82.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.6% | Tragic 81.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 86.1% | Tragic 81.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.0% | Tragic 79.0% |
Zimbabwean vs Cherokee Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 27.8%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 18.6%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.0% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.14%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.50%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 1.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Zimbabwean | Cherokee |
Family Households | Fair 64.1% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.9% | Average 27.5% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.4% | Good 46.7% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Tragic 3.18 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.1% | Tragic 6.8% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Good 46.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 13.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.7% | Tragic 36.7% |
Zimbabwean vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 20.2%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 13.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Zimbabwean | Cherokee |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.0% | Exceptional 7.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.0% | Exceptional 92.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Exceptional 59.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.3% | Exceptional 23.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Zimbabwean vs Cherokee Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 57.8%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 56.4%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 55.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.040%).
Education Level Metric | Zimbabwean | Cherokee |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.9% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.9% | Average 92.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Tragic 90.5% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.1% | Poor 88.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.0% | Tragic 83.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.9% | Tragic 60.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.2% | Tragic 53.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.3% | Tragic 38.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 43.3% | Tragic 30.2% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.7% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Zimbabwean vs Cherokee Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 50.5%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 48.4%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 48.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 24.8%).
Disability Metric | Zimbabwean | Cherokee |
Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 14.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 14.8% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 14.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Tragic 1.8% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Good 6.5% | Tragic 8.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 15.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.5% | Tragic 28.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.1% | Tragic 50.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.9% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.8% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 18.0% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 7.9% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.9% |