Zimbabwean vs Apache Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,196,048 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Apache within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.995. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.144% in Apache. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 1,144.4 Apache.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Apache communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,804 compared to $34,886, a difference of 31.3%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $84,451, a difference of 30.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $82,184, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $49,395, a difference of 3.8%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 7.2%), and median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $34,895, a difference of 16.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Apache communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 119.5%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 92.8%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 89.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 28.9%), single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 30.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 36.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Apache communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 94.4%), male unemployment (4.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 80.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 67.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 3.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Apache communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 60.7%, a difference of 10.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 10.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Apache communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 39.0%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 30.0%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 3.8%), family households (64.1% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Apache communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 21.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 14.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Apache communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 61.6%), bachelor's degree (43.3% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 53.1%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.25%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Apache communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 72.8%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 52.4%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 5.7%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 11.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 14.9%).