Ottawa vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Ottawa
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Ottawa
Chinese
3,097
SOCIAL INDEX
28.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
233rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Ottawa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,051,261 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Ottawa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.945. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ottawa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.482% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ottawa corresponds to an increase of 482.4 Chinese.
Ottawa vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,217 compared to $77,465, a difference of 45.6%), median household income ($70,984 compared to $98,496, a difference of 38.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,953 compared to $116,156, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 4.1%), median male earnings ($46,611 compared to $56,872, a difference of 22.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,366 compared to $58,162, a difference of 22.8%).
Income Metric | Ottawa | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,101 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,380 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,984 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $39,721 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,611 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,378 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,366 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $79,012 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,953 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,217 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.0% | Average 25.9% |
Ottawa vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (19.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 64.5%), single female poverty (26.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 61.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 61.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 20.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 25.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 25.4%).
Poverty Metric | Ottawa | Chinese |
Poverty | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Tragic 10.0% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.5% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.0% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.1% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 20.3% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.2% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.4% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.0% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.6% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 35.5% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Average 5.2% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.4% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Ottawa vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 45.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 33.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 7.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Ottawa | Chinese |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.1% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.9% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.3% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.9% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.9% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Ottawa vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 11.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.58%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Ottawa | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.0% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.7% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.0% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.8% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.0% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.4% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.6% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.5% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Ottawa vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 35.0%), single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 26.1%), and births to unmarried women (36.5% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.1% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 0.24%), currently married (46.5% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.34, a difference of 7.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Ottawa | Chinese |
Family Households | Tragic 63.0% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.1% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Poor 45.8% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.5% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Average 46.5% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.5% | Excellent 30.2% |
Ottawa vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 33.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 18.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.92%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 11.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Ottawa | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.7% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.9% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.1% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 6.6% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Ottawa vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 30.1%), bachelor's degree (31.1% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 23.6%), and master's degree (11.9% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.10%), 5th grade (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.11%).
Education Level Metric | Ottawa | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.1% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 91.9% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.1% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Average 85.8% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.2% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.9% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.3% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.1% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.9% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Fair 1.8% |
Ottawa vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 50.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 45.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.4%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.5%).
Disability Metric | Ottawa | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 14.2% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.6% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.6% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Fair 47.6% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.8% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.2% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.6% |