Scandinavian vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Scandinavian
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Scandinavians
Chinese
7,944
SOCIAL INDEX
76.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
98th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Scandinavian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,717,535 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Scandinavian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.766. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scandinavians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.104% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scandinavians corresponds to an increase of 104.2 Chinese.
Scandinavian vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,586 compared to $77,465, a difference of 25.8%), median household income ($86,073 compared to $98,496, a difference of 14.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,969 compared to $116,156, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,527 compared to $56,872, a difference of 2.4%), per capita income ($43,848 compared to $46,098, a difference of 5.1%), and median earnings ($46,433 compared to $48,836, a difference of 5.2%).
Income Metric | Scandinavian | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,848 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Good $104,410 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Good $86,073 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,433 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,527 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,306 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,654 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $95,596 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $102,969 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $61,586 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 29.1% | Average 25.9% |
Scandinavian vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (21.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 30.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 25.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.37%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 9.4%).
Poverty Metric | Scandinavian | Chinese |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.1% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.1% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.3% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Excellent 13.1% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.7% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.1% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Poor 13.1% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Average 21.1% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Average 16.3% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Good 28.9% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.1% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.7% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Scandinavian vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 64.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 0.93%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Scandinavian | Chinese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.7% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Excellent 7.4% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Scandinavian vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 13.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.58%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.68%).
Labor Participation Metric | Scandinavian | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Fair 65.0% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.6% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 78.5% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 84.9% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Fair 84.5% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Average 84.4% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 83.0% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Scandinavian vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.7%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.4%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.5% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 0.020%), births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and married-couple households (49.6% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 1.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Scandinavian | Chinese |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.0% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.6% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.14 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Poor 12.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.8% | Excellent 30.2% |
Scandinavian vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 17.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 10.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 3.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Scandinavian | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 93.1% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 62.1% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.6% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.0% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Scandinavian vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 5.3%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 3.9%), and associate's degree (46.9% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.020%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.020%), and 2nd grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.020%).
Education Level Metric | Scandinavian | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.2% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.5% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.2% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.5% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.9% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.7% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Excellent 61.0% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Good 46.9% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Average 37.5% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.4% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Fair 4.2% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Average 1.8% | Fair 1.8% |
Scandinavian vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 35.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 25.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.5%), disability (12.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 2.0%).
Disability Metric | Scandinavian | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 12.4% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 12.5% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 23.4% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.6% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Average 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Average 6.1% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |