Immigrants from Israel vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,524,114 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Israel communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.320. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Israel within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.028% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Israel corresponds to an increase of 27.8 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,384 compared to $46,098, a difference of 24.5%), median male earnings ($68,716 compared to $56,872, a difference of 20.8%), and median earnings ($57,034 compared to $48,836, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,913 compared to $58,162, a difference of 4.0%), median household income ($104,090 compared to $98,496, a difference of 5.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,893 compared to $116,156, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 47.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 46.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.5%), single father poverty (16.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 4.7%), and single mother poverty (26.6% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 32.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 28.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 3.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 26.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.1% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 20.3%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 9.8%), and family households (63.4% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.7%), currently married (48.1% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 89.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 85.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 52.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.5% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 8.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (49.2% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 22.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 52.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (7.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 76.0%), doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 72.7%), and master's degree (22.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 55.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.50%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.51%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 39.0%), male disability (9.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 26.1%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 3.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 6.2%).