Inupiat vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,135,037 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Inupiat communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.163. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Inupiat within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Inupiat corresponds to a decrease of 15.4 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Inupiat and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,355 compared to $116,156, a difference of 27.2%), householder income over 65 years ($61,061 compared to $77,465, a difference of 26.9%), and median family income ($91,730 compared to $116,188, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,080 compared to $41,461, a difference of 3.5%), householder income under 25 years ($55,935 compared to $58,162, a difference of 4.0%), and median earnings ($43,000 compared to $48,836, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Inupiat and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (20.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 105.3%), married-couple family poverty (7.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 95.9%), and family poverty (12.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 91.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.0% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 17.9%), single father poverty (19.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 26.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 39.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Inupiat and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (17.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 160.4%), male unemployment (12.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 145.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (9.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 139.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 39.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 54.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (14.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 60.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Inupiat and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.1% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.63%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Inupiat and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 146.5%), births to unmarried women (52.1% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 72.3%), and single mother households (8.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 64.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.8% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 0.53%), divorced or separated (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.63 compared to 3.34, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Inupiat and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 263.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 42.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (71.5% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 28.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.6% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 41.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 41.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Inupiat and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (32.6% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 49.0%), bachelor's degree (25.8% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 49.0%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (97.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.040%), 6th grade (98.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and 5th grade (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Inupiat and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (3.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 225.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (34.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 59.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.37%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 5.9%).