Alaska Native vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,145,990 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Alaska Native communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.276. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaska Natives within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.060% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaska Natives corresponds to an increase of 59.8 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($60,748 compared to $77,465, a difference of 27.5%), median household income ($79,509 compared to $98,496, a difference of 23.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,991 compared to $116,156, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 6.0%), householder income under 25 years ($54,000 compared to $58,162, a difference of 7.7%), and median female earnings ($38,202 compared to $41,461, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 70.1%), receiving food stamps (15.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 59.8%), and family poverty (10.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 59.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 17.6%), single mother poverty (30.9% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 25.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 26.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (14.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 148.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (7.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 90.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (10.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 67.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 11.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 35.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 35.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 77.6%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 43.3%), and births to unmarried women (38.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.37 compared to 3.34, a difference of 1.0%), family households (65.1% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and currently married (45.5% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 111.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 20.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.8% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 9.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 12.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 31.0%), associate's degree (37.5% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 29.5%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.060%), 5th grade (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 157.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (30.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 41.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.6%), ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.3%).