Zimbabwean vs British Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,933,155 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of British within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.710. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.269% in British. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 268.7 British.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and British communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 9.8%), householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $63,940, a difference of 3.0%), and median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $57,890, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($48,229 compared to $48,189, a difference of 0.080%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $98,359, a difference of 0.23%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $51,477, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and British communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 14.7%), single female poverty (19.5% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 8.1%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 1.1%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and poverty (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and British communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 14.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.65%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.67%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and British communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and British communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 7.4%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 6.0%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.54%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.80%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and British communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 19.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 11.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 4.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and British communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 13.6%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and bachelor's degree (43.3% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.7% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.20%), ged/equivalency (88.0% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and high school diploma (91.1% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and British communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 26.4%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 22.3%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 3.3%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 5.9%).