Immigrants from Western Asia vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,787,183 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Western Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.225. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Western Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Western Asia corresponds to a decrease of 2.0 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,645 compared to $77,465, a difference of 23.7%), householder income under 25 years ($52,190 compared to $58,162, a difference of 11.4%), and median household income ($90,005 compared to $98,496, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,375 compared to $41,461, a difference of 0.21%), median earnings ($49,389 compared to $48,836, a difference of 1.1%), and wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 63.4%), family poverty (9.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 42.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 4.1%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 14.1%), and single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 51.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 25.2%), and female unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 6.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.4% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.81%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 11.1%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.9%), and married-couple households (46.9% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.020%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.34, a difference of 2.5%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 49.2%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 34.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 11.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 29.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 59.2%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 27.3%), and professional degree (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (62.5% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 0.42%), college, under 1 year (67.8% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 0.73%), and nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 28.5%), male disability (10.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 13.5%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.17%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.95%), and disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.5%).