Blackfeet vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,458,698 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Blackfeet communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.513. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Blackfeet within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.172% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Blackfeet corresponds to an increase of 172.0 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,029 compared to $77,465, a difference of 43.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,595 compared to $116,156, a difference of 34.1%), and median household income ($73,509 compared to $98,496, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 2.7%), median female earnings ($35,864 compared to $41,461, a difference of 15.6%), and median earnings ($41,822 compared to $48,836, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 73.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (20.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 71.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (20.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 69.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 20.2%), single mother poverty (33.2% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 34.8%), and single male poverty (15.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 41.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 55.4%), female unemployment (5.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 30.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.9%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.2% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 19.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 0.85%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 44.9%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 37.0%), and births to unmarried women (37.9% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.0%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and family households (63.6% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 26.2%), no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 16.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 6.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 37.2%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 28.4%), and bachelor's degree (31.5% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.45%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.45%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 44.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 40.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.060%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.7%).