Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Belarus Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,399,371 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.187. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.107% in Immigrants from Belarus. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 107.0 Immigrants from Belarus.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $62,658, a difference of 11.3%), median earnings ($48,229 compared to $53,043, a difference of 10.0%), and per capita income ($45,804 compared to $50,303, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 2.3%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $114,586, a difference of 4.2%), and median household income ($90,618 compared to $94,399, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 31.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 23.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 0.87%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 20.3%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 18.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 73.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 18.9%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 11.9%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.43%), family households (64.1% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.59%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.17, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 85.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 35.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 9.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 19.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 30.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 20.7%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 6.6%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (64.2% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.12%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.36%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 23.0%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 15.1%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.51%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.77%), and male disability (10.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.3%).