Zimbabwean vs Polish Community Comparison

COMPARE

Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Polish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Zimbabweans

Poles

Exceptional
Excellent
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,413
SOCIAL INDEX
81.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
72nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Polish Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,118,319 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Poles within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.091. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.189% in Poles. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to a decrease of 188.8 Poles.
Zimbabwean Integration in Polish Communities

Zimbabwean vs Polish Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Polish communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 8.5%), householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $61,598, a difference of 6.9%), and median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $58,139, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($45,804 compared to $46,123, a difference of 0.70%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $105,952, a difference of 0.85%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $48,659, a difference of 0.89%).
Zimbabwean vs Polish Income
Income MetricZimbabweanPolish
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,804
Exceptional
$46,123
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$110,011
Exceptional
$108,507
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,618
Excellent
$88,472
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,229
Exceptional
$48,659
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,302
Exceptional
$58,139
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,798
Excellent
$40,371
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,259
Good
$52,407
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$98,586
Exceptional
$99,685
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,849
Exceptional
$105,952
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,854
Good
$61,598
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Tragic
28.5%

Zimbabwean vs Polish Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Polish communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 11.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 9.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 0.10%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.40%).
Zimbabwean vs Polish Poverty
Poverty MetricZimbabweanPolish
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Exceptional
11.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Exceptional
18.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
12.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Exceptional
15.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
14.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
14.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Poor
13.0%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.5%
Exceptional
20.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
17.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
9.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
10.0%

Zimbabwean vs Polish Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Polish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 18.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.90%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.1%).
Zimbabwean vs Polish Unemployment
Unemployment MetricZimbabweanPolish
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
16.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Good
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Tragic
10.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%

Zimbabwean vs Polish Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Polish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 77.6%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.0%).
Zimbabwean vs Polish Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricZimbabweanPolish
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.3%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.0%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Exceptional
42.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Exceptional
77.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.1%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Exceptional
83.6%

Zimbabwean vs Polish Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Polish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.8%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 7.4%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.12%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.71%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 2.5%).
Zimbabwean vs Polish Family Structure
Family Structure MetricZimbabweanPolish
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Poor
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
26.5%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.4%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Tragic
3.09
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.1%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Good
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Good
30.8%

Zimbabwean vs Polish Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Polish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 7.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.24%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.74%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Zimbabwean vs Polish Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricZimbabweanPolish
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Exceptional
8.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Exceptional
91.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Exceptional
58.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.3%
Excellent
20.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Average
6.4%

Zimbabwean vs Polish Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Polish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 20.2%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 19.3%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.32%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.32%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.33%).
Zimbabwean vs Polish Education Level
Education Level MetricZimbabweanPolish
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
97.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
97.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Exceptional
96.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Exceptional
95.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Exceptional
94.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Exceptional
93.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Exceptional
91.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Exceptional
88.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.9%
Excellent
66.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.2%
Excellent
60.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.3%
Excellent
48.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Good
39.1%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Excellent
15.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Good
1.9%

Zimbabwean vs Polish Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Polish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 35.2%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 20.7%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 2.3%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 6.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 6.1%).
Zimbabwean vs Polish Disability
Disability MetricZimbabweanPolish
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Average
11.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Exceptional
22.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.1%
Exceptional
45.3%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Excellent
2.4%