Zimbabwean vs Welsh Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,645,080 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Welsh within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.035. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Welsh. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 13.8 Welsh.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 9.9%), householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $60,666, a difference of 8.6%), and median household income ($90,618 compared to $83,628, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $50,597, a difference of 1.3%), median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $54,647, a difference of 3.0%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $45,710, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 19.8%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 14.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 1.8%), poverty (11.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and male poverty (10.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 14.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.2%), female unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 42.3%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 11.7%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 8.6%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.85%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.12, a difference of 2.6%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 26.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 16.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 21.3%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 20.5%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.7% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.12%), high school diploma (91.1% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 38.5%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 30.5%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 2.3%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 10.1%).