Immigrants from Iraq vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,665,074 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Iraq communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.047. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Iraq within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Iraq corresponds to a decrease of 0.7 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($59,824 compared to $77,465, a difference of 29.5%), median household income ($82,594 compared to $98,496, a difference of 19.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,201 compared to $116,156, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 3.0%), median male earnings ($52,681 compared to $56,872, a difference of 8.0%), and median earnings ($44,988 compared to $48,836, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 55.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (17.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 43.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 39.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 4.9%), single father poverty (14.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 59.6%), female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 22.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.80%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.5%), births to unmarried women (27.1% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 11.4%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.2%), currently married (47.3% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and family households (65.0% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 35.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 18.1%), and no vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.5% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.75%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.1% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and no vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 62.4%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 7.4%), and associate's degree (46.4% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.97%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.97%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 19.0%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 17.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.56%), disability age over 75 (49.1% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.73%), and disability (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.4%).