Zimbabwean vs Swedish Community Comparison

COMPARE

Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Swedish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Zimbabweans

Swedes

Exceptional
Excellent
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,881
SOCIAL INDEX
86.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
41st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Swedish Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,905,080 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.054. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.057% in Swedes. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 57.2 Swedes.
Zimbabwean Integration in Swedish Communities

Zimbabwean vs Swedish Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 11.8%), householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $62,736, a difference of 5.0%), and median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $39,421, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($45,804 compared to $45,750, a difference of 0.12%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $106,377, a difference of 0.44%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $99,136, a difference of 0.56%).
Zimbabwean vs Swedish Income
Income MetricZimbabweanSwedish
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,804
Exceptional
$45,750
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$110,011
Exceptional
$108,499
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,618
Exceptional
$88,524
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,229
Excellent
$47,851
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,302
Exceptional
$57,445
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,798
Fair
$39,421
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,259
Excellent
$52,986
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$98,586
Exceptional
$99,136
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,849
Exceptional
$106,377
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,854
Excellent
$62,736
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Tragic
29.4%

Zimbabwean vs Swedish Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 10.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 9.8%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.18%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 1.6%).
Zimbabwean vs Swedish Poverty
Poverty MetricZimbabweanSwedish
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Average
20.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
12.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Exceptional
15.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
13.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Exceptional
13.7%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.5%
Good
20.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Excellent
28.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
8.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
9.2%

Zimbabwean vs Swedish Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 14.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.51%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.59%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.86%).
Zimbabwean vs Swedish Unemployment
Unemployment MetricZimbabweanSwedish
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
15.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Excellent
7.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%

Zimbabwean vs Swedish Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 14.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.40%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.85%).
Zimbabwean vs Swedish Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricZimbabweanSwedish
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.3%
Average
65.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.0%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Exceptional
44.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Exceptional
78.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.1%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Exceptional
83.7%

Zimbabwean vs Swedish Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.4%), currently married (47.0% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 6.3%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.66%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.10, a difference of 3.2%).
Zimbabwean vs Swedish Family Structure
Family Structure MetricZimbabweanSwedish
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.4%
Exceptional
49.7%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.1%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Exceptional
50.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Exceptional
29.6%

Zimbabwean vs Swedish Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 33.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 18.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 8.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 13.5%).
Zimbabwean vs Swedish Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricZimbabweanSwedish
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Exceptional
6.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Exceptional
93.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Exceptional
61.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.3%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Exceptional
7.6%

Zimbabwean vs Swedish Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 22.9%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 16.3%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.38%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.38%).
Zimbabwean vs Swedish Education Level
Education Level MetricZimbabweanSwedish
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
97.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
97.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Exceptional
96.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Exceptional
95.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Exceptional
94.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Exceptional
93.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Exceptional
92.2%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Exceptional
88.8%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.9%
Exceptional
68.7%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.2%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.3%
Exceptional
48.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Good
39.1%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Good
15.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Good
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Excellent
2.0%

Zimbabwean vs Swedish Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 34.3%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 27.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 3.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.9%), and disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 5.2%).
Zimbabwean vs Swedish Disability
Disability MetricZimbabweanSwedish
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.1%
Exceptional
45.7%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.3%