Comanche vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Comanche
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Comanche
Chinese
1,908
SOCIAL INDEX
16.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
283rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Comanche Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,535,418 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.858. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.093% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 93.2 Chinese.
Comanche vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $77,465, a difference of 41.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $116,156, a difference of 35.4%), and median household income ($73,747 compared to $98,496, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 3.5%), median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $41,461, a difference of 16.3%), and median earnings ($41,519 compared to $48,836, a difference of 17.6%).
Income Metric | Comanche | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,088 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,556 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $73,747 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,519 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,202 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,661 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,518 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,152 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $85,787 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,922 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Average 25.9% |
Comanche vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 69.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (20.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 69.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 66.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 19.9%), receiving food stamps (13.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 35.7%), and single mother poverty (33.9% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 37.8%).
Poverty Metric | Comanche | Chinese |
Poverty | Tragic 15.0% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Tragic 11.0% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Tragic 16.2% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 23.6% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.5% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.0% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.1% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.0% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.6% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.9% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Comanche vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 28.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.2% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 26.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 8.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Comanche | Chinese |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Poor 11.8% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Comanche vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Comanche | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.6% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.0% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 37.7% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.4% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 81.5% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.2% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Comanche vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 36.2%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 28.5%), and births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.34, a difference of 2.7%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and family households (63.5% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 7.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Comanche | Chinese |
Family Households | Tragic 63.5% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.5% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.0% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.7% | Excellent 30.2% |
Comanche vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 30.3%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 24.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 13.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Comanche | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.2% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 89.9% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.5% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.0% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Comanche vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 39.9%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 26.3%), and associate's degree (39.9% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.54%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.55%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.55%).
Education Level Metric | Comanche | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.1% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Good 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Fair 97.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Fair 95.8% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Poor 95.5% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.6% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.9% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.9% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.6% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.4% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.4% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 39.9% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.9% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.1% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Fair 1.8% |
Comanche vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 43.2%), vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 39.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 6.1%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 7.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 9.0%).
Disability Metric | Comanche | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 14.2% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.3% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.7% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.6% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.6% |