Immigrants from Oceania vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,701,628 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.463. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.030% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to a decrease of 29.8 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $77,465, a difference of 20.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,705 compared to $116,156, a difference of 12.0%), and median household income ($89,100 compared to $98,496, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 1.0%), per capita income ($45,220 compared to $46,098, a difference of 1.9%), and median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $56,872, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 37.7%), child poverty among boys under 16 (16.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 35.0%), and family poverty (8.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.25%), single male poverty (12.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 13.0%), and receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 51.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 19.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 24.6%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.6%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.34, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (64.9% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 18.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 16.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 52.3%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 8.2%), and associate's degree (45.8% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (14.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 0.68%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.76%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 15.9%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 15.6%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.5%), female disability (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.9%).