Sudanese vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,371,663 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Sudanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.242. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sudanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.044% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sudanese corresponds to an increase of 43.6 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($58,281 compared to $77,465, a difference of 32.9%), median household income ($78,529 compared to $98,496, a difference of 25.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,718 compared to $116,156, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.0% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 8.1%), median female earnings ($38,215 compared to $41,461, a difference of 8.5%), and median earnings ($44,419 compared to $48,836, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (18.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 56.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 55.1%), and married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 54.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 3.0%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 18.9%), and single mother poverty (30.0% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 22.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 40.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 24.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (68.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.8% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 33.8%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 22.7%), and married-couple households (42.1% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.34, a difference of 4.4%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and births to unmarried women (32.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 57.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 33.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 12.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 19.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 57.0%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 18.6%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.85%), 2nd grade (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.85%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 25.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 24.4%), and cognitive disability (18.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.48%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and female disability (12.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.5%).