South American Indian vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,114,404 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within South American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.823. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.398% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South American Indians corresponds to an increase of 1,398.2 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,215 compared to $77,465, a difference of 24.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,171 compared to $116,156, a difference of 14.8%), and median household income ($87,446 compared to $98,496, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,019 compared to $41,461, a difference of 3.6%), median earnings ($46,952 compared to $48,836, a difference of 4.0%), and per capita income ($44,206 compared to $46,098, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 46.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 42.2%), and family poverty (9.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 2.0%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 10.3%), and single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 18.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 38.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 24.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 6.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 24.6%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 14.1%), and married-couple households (46.0% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.34, a difference of 2.4%), births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and family households (64.6% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 46.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 41.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.0% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 11.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 24.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 51.9%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 11.9%), and master's degree (15.9% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.78%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.80%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 28.5%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 17.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and female disability (11.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 4.3%).