Egyptian vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,231,181 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Egyptian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.570. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Egyptians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.050% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Egyptians corresponds to an increase of 49.8 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,441 compared to $77,465, a difference of 18.4%), median male earnings ($61,095 compared to $56,872, a difference of 7.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,444 compared to $58,162, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,282 compared to $104,264, a difference of 0.98%), median family income ($114,119 compared to $116,188, a difference of 1.8%), and wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 33.9%), married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 32.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.8%), single male poverty (11.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and single father poverty (14.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 37.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 25.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 11.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 14.6%), family households with children (28.6% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 9.9%), and births to unmarried women (28.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.95%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.3%), and currently married (47.9% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 44.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 44.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.2% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 4.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 10.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 25.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 40.2%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 24.0%), and master's degree (17.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (68.3% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.62%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 35.3%), male disability (10.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 19.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.66%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 4.7%).