Honduran vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,975,181 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Honduran communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.185. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hondurans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hondurans corresponds to an increase of 20.3 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Honduran and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($52,634 compared to $77,465, a difference of 47.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($84,079 compared to $116,156, a difference of 38.2%), and median family income ($85,004 compared to $116,188, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.6% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 9.9%), median female earnings ($35,013 compared to $41,461, a difference of 18.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($48,885 compared to $58,162, a difference of 19.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Honduran and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 96.2%), family poverty (12.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 90.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (22.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 88.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 10.6%), single male poverty (14.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 27.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 33.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Honduran and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 41.5%), female unemployment (5.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 31.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 8.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 12.1%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Honduran and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.4% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Honduran and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 56.8%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 39.7%), and births to unmarried women (38.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.35 compared to 3.34, a difference of 0.34%), family households (64.4% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Honduran and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 45.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 45.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 15.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 29.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Honduran and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 108.0%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 27.8%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Honduran and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 31.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 25.4%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.17%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and disability age over 75 (48.9% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.42%).