Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Israel Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,944,299 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.269. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.123% in Immigrants from Israel. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 123.4 Immigrants from Israel.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,804 compared to $57,384, a difference of 25.3%), median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $68,716, a difference of 22.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $117,219, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $69,857, a difference of 6.1%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $55,913, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 31.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 19.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 0.23%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.62%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 25.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 27.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.76%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 23.1%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 20.6%), and births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.48%), family households (64.1% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.98%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 72.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 34.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 7.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 16.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 29.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 51.1%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 34.1%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.7% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.21%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.23%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 23.1%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 22.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.21%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 4.7%), and female disability (11.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 5.5%).