Zimbabwean vs Argentinean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,627,356 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Argentineans within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.078% in Argentineans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 77.7 Argentineans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,804 compared to $49,862, a difference of 8.9%), median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $60,117, a difference of 6.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $54,154, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $65,246, a difference of 0.93%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $112,665, a difference of 2.4%), and wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 24.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 21.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 1.1%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 16.2%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 12.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 16.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.59%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 4.5%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.0% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.19%), married-couple households (47.4% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 0.38%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 23.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 6.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 2.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 20.0%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.0%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (43.3% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 0.0%), associate's degree (51.3% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 11.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.2%).