Zimbabwean vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,430,839 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.119. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.505% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 504.9 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($90,618 compared to $76,383, a difference of 18.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $90,951, a difference of 17.5%), and per capita income ($45,804 compared to $39,163, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $51,713, a difference of 0.89%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $62,330, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 63.8%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 54.9%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 8.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 10.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 105.2%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 101.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 99.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 14.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 19.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 16.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 52.7%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 31.5%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.0%), and family households (64.1% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 72.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 25.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 3.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 53.2%), bachelor's degree (43.3% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 50.2%), and associate's degree (51.3% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.9% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.020%), high school diploma (91.1% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and 12th grade, no diploma (92.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 87.4%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 60.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 50.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.10%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 54.0%, a difference of 12.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.3%).