Zimbabwean vs Arab Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,603,535 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Arabs within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.689. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.187% in Arabs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 1,187.5 Arabs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Arab communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $62,266, a difference of 5.8%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $106,952, a difference of 2.9%), and median household income ($90,618 compared to $88,398, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $51,219, a difference of 0.080%), median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $40,718, a difference of 0.20%), and per capita income ($45,804 compared to $45,662, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Arab communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 38.6%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 21.2%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 0.45%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.97%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Arab communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 15.7%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 14.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Arab communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Arab communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.7%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.96%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.0%), currently married (47.0% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Arab communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 15.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 7.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Arab communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 21.6%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.38%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.38%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Arab communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.2%), ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.9%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.22%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 2.1%).