Zimbabwean vs Fijian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 27,443,544 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Fijians within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.154. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.054% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to a decrease of 53.8 Fijians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($110,011 compared to $87,387, a difference of 25.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $85,187, a difference of 25.4%), and per capita income ($45,804 compared to $36,690, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $50,132, a difference of 2.2%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 14.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $56,768, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 41.5%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 37.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.61%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 31.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 31.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.65%), and female unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 35.8%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 18.6%), and births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 32.3%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.0% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.5%), married-couple households (47.4% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households (64.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 21.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 9.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.52%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 0.65%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 101.3%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 77.6%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 72.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.75%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.76%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 26.6%), ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 26.2%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.42%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.8%).