Zimbabwean vs Senegalese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Senegalese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Zimbabweans

Senegalese

Exceptional
Poor
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,684
SOCIAL INDEX
14.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
292nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Senegalese Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,034,455 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Senegalese within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.064. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.019% in Senegalese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 19.1 Senegalese.
Zimbabwean Integration in Senegalese Communities

Zimbabwean vs Senegalese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Senegalese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 27.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $86,897, a difference of 23.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $53,591, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $39,384, a difference of 3.6%), householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $48,953, a difference of 4.7%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $44,373, a difference of 8.7%).
Zimbabwean vs Senegalese Income
Income MetricZimbabweanSenegalese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,804
Tragic
$41,000
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$110,011
Tragic
$91,475
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,618
Tragic
$74,999
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,229
Tragic
$44,373
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,302
Tragic
$49,774
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,798
Fair
$39,384
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,259
Tragic
$48,953
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$98,586
Tragic
$82,852
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,849
Tragic
$86,897
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,854
Tragic
$53,591
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Exceptional
20.7%

Zimbabwean vs Senegalese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Senegalese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 62.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 49.2%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 47.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.15%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 8.5%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 10.9%).
Zimbabwean vs Senegalese Poverty
Poverty MetricZimbabweanSenegalese
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
15.3%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
11.5%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
14.1%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
16.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Tragic
23.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
15.6%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
20.9%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Tragic
20.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
20.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
20.3%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.5%
Tragic
23.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
16.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
31.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
13.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
14.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
15.4%

Zimbabwean vs Senegalese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Senegalese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 35.8%), male unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 34.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 8.8%).
Zimbabwean vs Senegalese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricZimbabweanSenegalese
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.4%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
13.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
21.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
11.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
8.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.2%

Zimbabwean vs Senegalese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Senegalese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.59%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 0.82%).
Zimbabwean vs Senegalese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricZimbabweanSenegalese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.3%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.0%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Poor
35.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Fair
74.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.1%
Exceptional
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Tragic
82.4%

Zimbabwean vs Senegalese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Senegalese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 35.8%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 28.1%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.46%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 4.9%).
Zimbabwean vs Senegalese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricZimbabweanSenegalese
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Tragic
59.8%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.4%
Tragic
38.6%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Fair
3.21
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Excellent
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.1%
Tragic
8.2%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Tragic
40.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Tragic
36.8%

Zimbabwean vs Senegalese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Senegalese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 118.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 49.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 13.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 29.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 42.4%).
Zimbabwean vs Senegalese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricZimbabweanSenegalese
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Tragic
19.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Tragic
80.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Tragic
44.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.3%
Tragic
14.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Tragic
4.3%

Zimbabwean vs Senegalese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Senegalese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 32.5%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 16.4%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.59%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.60%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.61%).
Zimbabwean vs Senegalese Education Level
Education Level MetricZimbabweanSenegalese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
95.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
95.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Tragic
94.2%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Tragic
93.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Tragic
91.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Tragic
89.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Tragic
87.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Tragic
84.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.9%
Tragic
63.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.2%
Poor
58.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.3%
Fair
45.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Average
37.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Good
15.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Excellent
2.0%

Zimbabwean vs Senegalese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Senegalese communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 22.4%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 20.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.31%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 7.1%).
Zimbabwean vs Senegalese Disability
Disability MetricZimbabweanSenegalese
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
12.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Fair
11.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
24.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.1%
Poor
47.9%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
19.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.4%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%