Pueblo vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,036,096 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Pueblo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.951. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pueblo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.021% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pueblo corresponds to an increase of 20.8 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,601 compared to $116,156, a difference of 53.6%), median household income ($64,692 compared to $98,496, a difference of 52.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($68,910 compared to $104,264, a difference of 51.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (20.7% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 25.3%), median female earnings ($32,564 compared to $41,461, a difference of 27.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,018 compared to $58,162, a difference of 29.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 204.8%), family poverty (17.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 161.1%), and male poverty (18.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 113.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (21.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 37.1%), single mother poverty (37.2% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 51.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 66.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (8.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 72.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (10.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 71.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 68.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 7.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 23.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 26.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (75.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 11.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (72.6% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 11.1%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.9% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (80.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (53.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 77.4%), single father households (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 67.6%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.2% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 0.10%), family households with children (25.2% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and average family size (3.79 compared to 3.34, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 30.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 2.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (25.5% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 50.6%), associate's degree (34.0% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 42.9%), and master's degree (10.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.11%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 62.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (33.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 52.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (14.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 14.4%), disability age over 75 (55.9% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 14.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 16.7%).