Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Belgium Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,512,430 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belgium within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.475. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.042% in Immigrants from Belgium. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 42.0 Immigrants from Belgium.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,804 compared to $55,082, a difference of 20.3%), median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $66,125, a difference of 17.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $112,575, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $69,703, a difference of 5.8%), householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $54,830, a difference of 7.0%), and median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $44,587, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 13.0%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 8.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.020%), and female poverty (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 17.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 13.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.53%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 9.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.8%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.4%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.1%), married-couple households (47.4% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 30.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 33.7%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 27.2%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.0%), 4th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 7.2%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.32%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.96%), and disability (10.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.0%).