Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,735,910 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.805. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.219% in Immigrants from Costa Rica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 218.9 Immigrants from Costa Rica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $59,848, a difference of 10.0%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $101,354, a difference of 8.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $100,141, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $52,643, a difference of 2.7%), median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $39,186, a difference of 4.1%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $45,928, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 33.2%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 28.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 4.3%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.73%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 0.94%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 16.3%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 11.0%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.9%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 13.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.88%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 32.8%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 27.5%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.58%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.59%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.2%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.68%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 2.6%).