Australian vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Australian
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Australians
Chinese
9,058
SOCIAL INDEX
88.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
32nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Australian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,739,532 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.183. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.147% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 147.1 Chinese.
Australian vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($66,891 compared to $77,465, a difference of 15.8%), per capita income ($52,074 compared to $46,098, a difference of 13.0%), and median male earnings ($62,857 compared to $56,872, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($118,440 compared to $116,188, a difference of 1.9%), median household income ($96,490 compared to $98,496, a difference of 2.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($113,533 compared to $116,156, a difference of 2.3%).
Income Metric | Australian | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $52,074 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $118,440 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $96,490 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $52,294 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $62,857 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,308 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,739 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $107,912 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $113,533 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,891 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.2% | Average 25.9% |
Australian vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 28.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 26.6%), and single female poverty (20.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.5%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 14.9%).
Poverty Metric | Australian | Chinese |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.8% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.5% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Good 12.6% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Excellent 20.3% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.7% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.3% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.5% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Australian vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 47.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 20.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 1.9%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Australian | Chinese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.9% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Average 4.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Average 8.7% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.5% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Australian vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.66%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.94%).
Labor Participation Metric | Australian | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Good 65.3% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.5% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 37.8% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.5% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 84.9% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.0% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.3% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Fair 82.5% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Australian vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 10.3%), family households (62.8% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 2.4%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and currently married (47.6% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 4.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Australian | Chinese |
Family Households | Tragic 62.8% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.9% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.4% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.13 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.6% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.5% | Excellent 30.2% |
Australian vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 35.0%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 22.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 18.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Australian | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.1% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.0% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.7% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.1% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 6.6% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Australian vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 35.8%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 31.9%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.12%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.12%).
Education Level Metric | Australian | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.0% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.1% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.1% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.9% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.2% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.1% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.4% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.6% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.9% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 44.0% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.4% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.9% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.4% | Fair 1.8% |
Australian vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 21.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.3%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.66%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 4.4%).
Disability Metric | Australian | Chinese |
Disability | Excellent 11.5% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Average 11.3% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Poor 6.8% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.0% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.7% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Good 17.2% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |